To the problem in question will have a worse UX than the legacy gradebook provides. Instructors that expect to review grades infrequently enough that not having a direct link Groups whose instructors need not ever manually override grades do not need this project, but may not be any worse offĭepending on their needs. Learners.' However, this project comes with no such warning. Link for the legacy gradebook reports that 'this feature is available only to courses with a small number of enrolled The gradebook is expected to be much more performant for larger numbers of students as well. It expects the instructor to be familiar with the problems theyĪre grading and which unit they refer to. Quick links to the problems for the instructor to visit. This project does not (yet, at least) create any graphs, which the traditional gradebook does. What does the legacy gradebook offer that this project does not? Scored within a certain range, and by assignment types (note: Not problem types, but categories like ‘Exams’ or UsageProblems can be filtered by student as in the traditional gradebook, but can also be filtered by scores to see who The micro-frontend offers a great deal more granularity when searching for problems, an easy interface for editing grades, anĪudit trail for seeing who edited what grade and what reason they gave (if any) for doing so. Should I use Gradebook in my course? What does this offer over the legacy gradebook? Bulk Grade Management: Override Learner Subsection Scores in Bulk (read-the-docs).Basic Usage: Review Learner Grades (read-the-docs).Additionally for Masters courses, Gradebook enables bulk management of subsection grades.

Gradebook allows course staff to view, filter, and override subsection grades for a course.

Gradekeeper activation key